Omul lup
Continut Platit
Acest articol nu este disponibil gratis.
Detalii mai jos :
Incepand de asta noapte am operat cateva modificari la modul in care Trilema livreaza articole. Sistemul cel nou e oarecum complex, asa ca sa-l explicam pe indelete.
Fiecare cititor (inteles in termeni de IP) poate citi cate trei articole diferite in fiecare zi (24 de ore). Odata cele trei epuizate, in locul articolului solicitat va primi o pagina care-i explica c-a depasit numarul de articole gratuite pe ziua respectiva, si-i ofera un link pentru mai multe detalii. In principiu eu scriu cam cate trei articole pe zi, plus-minus, asa incat ar trebui sa fie fix destul pentru a urmari Trilema in continuare fara probleme. De asemenea conversatiile n-ar trebui sa fie tulburate, cititorul poate lasa oricate comentarii doreste la cele trei articole pe care si le-a ales pentru ziua respectiva, si de asemenea poate citi de oricate ori pofteste comentariile lasate de altii. De notat ca termenul de 24 de ore curge subiectiv, functie de accesarile cititorului, nu exista o ora fixa pe server la care toata lumea isi reprimeste creditele.
Toate IP-urile noi (adica acele IP-uri care incarca pentru prima oara o pagina pe Trilema, de la introducerea acestui sistem) primesc un bonus de 24 de incarcari suplimentare. Asta inseamna ca pot incarca, pe langa cele 3 articole zilnice, inca 24 in total. Deci, citind azi 4, maine 10, poimaine 19 am ajuns la 0, si de-acum suntem limitati la cele 3 zilnice. De notat ca sistemul nu retine decat ultimele trei articole vizitate, si ca atare e posibil sa epuizati creditul incarcand doar 4 articole in ordine, 1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4 etc. In acest exemplu se uzeaza cate o unitate pe ciclu. De asemenea de notat ca odata plata realizata si creditul alocat sunteti identificat strict prin IP, daca ISP-ul aloca IP-ul dvs altcuiva tocmai ce v-a pagubit de niste incarcari suplimentare.
Paginile (precum de exemplu ), indecsii categoriilor (precum de exemplu http://polimedia.us/trilema/category/3-ani-experienta/) si arhivele (precum de exemplu http://polimedia.us/trilema/2010/08/) sunt accesibile fara restrictii, nefiind in nici un fel incluse in acest sistem.
Cititorii care nu doresc sa fie astfel limitati pot sa plateasca 5 euro, (puteti plati cu orice card Visa, nu-i nevoie sa aveti sau sa va faceti cont) in schimbul carora primesc 5000 de incarcari suplimentare. Avand in vedere ca la ora actuala Trilema are putin peste 1300 3000 de articole in total, 5000 de incarcari suplimentare ar trebui sa ajunga o vreme. Puteti de asemenea plati cu bitcoin : trimiteti un email care sa contina adresa dvs, dupa care trimiteti plata pe adresa 1JPvucRfu3ZzEvfBUQTJwsxMrZjeTqD6zR. Veti primi un numar de credite egal cu cantitatea de bitcoin trimisa x cursul BTCEUR x 1000.
Cititorii care nu doresc sa fie limitati dar nici nu doresc (sau nu pot, din orice motiv) sa plateasca in bani pot sa-si faca un cont pe fain, unde, dupa ce aduna 1000 de karma pot sa vanda 500 in schimbul incarcarilor suplimentare (specificati in email).
Cititorii care nu doresc nici sa fie limitati, nici sa plateasca si nici sa munceasca pot sa foloseasca un proxy, sa incarce Trilema de pe calculatorul prietenilor sau pe wireless-ul cafenelelor etcetera. Solutii sunt probabil multe, chiar daca m-ar mira sa merite.
In final, imi face placere sa anunt ca un numar de comentatori activi si inteligenti primesc 1000 de credite ex oficio. Lista, in ordine alfabetica : adi ; Anonimosu ; ByREV ; calmogen ; cipslim ; costin ; dAImon ; Diana Coman ; Dr.A ; F ; factor ; Florin ; Ionut ; krossfire ; Lucian ; Luka D ; Mari ; Marius ; McGogoo ; Mihai ; Porcul de York ; spyked. Lista ramane in principiu deschisa la dispozitia mea.
Uite ca pana la urma n-o fost chiar asa de complex. Sa ne auzim sanatosi dara. Pentru comentarii incercati aici.
Joi, 8 Aprilie 2010
tie ti-i clar ca viata e scurta tare, da? alea 2 ore nu le mai recuperezi in veci!
filme in care apar vampiri si werewolfi is risipa de pelicula.
era macar un zombie in film? ca altfel… :D
Joi, 8 Aprilie 2010
pai te laudai ca nu te uiti la filme decat daca te conving 3 critici si 7 fete fragede. cum ai facut exceptie de la regula?
Joi, 8 Aprilie 2010
Uneori ma duc la film ca sa avem fundal sonor pentru blowjob etc.
Joi, 8 Aprilie 2010
Pai stai un pic atunci ca poate nui vina la regizoru asta ca poatei vina feti. Casai in lucrun echipa nu sti pe cine sa dai vina.
Joi, 8 Aprilie 2010
Io-s de acord ca fata-i de vina, da’ care fata ?!
Joi, 8 Aprilie 2010
Cea cu blowjobu. Asam presupus eu ca era o fata. Daca era baiat atunci baiatu.
Joi, 8 Aprilie 2010
Fata, da. Da’ nu o fata. Ci doua fete. Care fiecare dintre ele fiind cate-o fata, tot nu-i clar, care fata ?
Joi, 8 Aprilie 2010
subiectul era omul lup si nu ouale lu Marcel.
Joi, 8 Aprilie 2010
Daca Omu’ Lup se epuizeaza mai repede ca oole lu’ Marcel, cine ce vina are ?
Eventual JiJi.
Joi, 8 Aprilie 2010
Pai Marcel a zis in comenturi ca si citesc Uneori ma duc la film ca sa avem fundal sonor pentru blowjob etc. Ca doar nu mas apuca acuma sa i comentez la text ca alai mai lung.
Vineri, 9 Aprilie 2010
Filmul e o mizerie. Am incercat sa il vad tot. E greu, n-am reusit.
Vineri, 9 Aprilie 2010
Este perfect posibil sa nu fi reusit nimeni.
Vineri, 9 Aprilie 2010
Dupa wikipedia:
In February 2007, director Mark Romanek was attached to helm The Wolfman.[8] In January 2008, Romanek left the project because of creative differences.[10] Brett Ratner emerged as a frontrunner to replace Romanek, but the studio also met with Frank Darabont, James Mangold and Joe Johnston. They were also interested in Bill Condon, and Martin Campbell was interested.[11] Johnston was hired to direct on February 3, 2008, and the film’s shooting schedule and budget remained as intended.[12] Johnston hired David Self to rewrite the script.[13]
…
However, director Joe Johnston explained that joining the picture three weeks before photography placed limitations on his ability to film without using CG effects. He has stated, “I recognized that there were things that I was going to be able to do from the beginning to the end… and things that I had to rely on post-production for.” In reference to filming Benicio del Toro’s actual transformation into the Wolfman, Johnston further explained, “I decided to basically shoot just Benicio, in the sequence where … he transforms … and decide in post-production what I wanted the transformation to be. That was really my main reason [for using CG]; it gave me so much more flexibility.”
…
Leonard Maltin has panned the film on his weekly television segment, describing Rick Baker’s latest werewolf incarnation as “eerily reminiscent of Paddington Bear”.
…
It was reported that Danny Elfman wrote a dark, melodic, and moody score for The Wolfman, which was rejected by the studio after the film was cut down a half an hour in length and the music became too “wall-to-wall,” creating what Johnson called too much repetition. Due to his not being able to come back and re-score (because he was contractually obligated to work on Tim Burton’s upcoming Alice in Wonderland feature film), the producers decided rather than to expand on his ideas with a new composer (a path that they would eventually take), to take a gamble and attempt a different composer, along with a completely different approach, which would include extensive re-shooting of scenes. The idea was to quicken the pace and strike a similar tone to the successful Underworld films, turning a slow-paced story into a much faster one. Paul Haslinger subsequently wrote an electronic contemporary incarnation of the Wolfman score, which the studio quickly realized was not appropriate for the 1800’s gothic setting. Elfman’s score, which was previously recorded, is, as a result, the one that is used in the final film instead.[45]
Universal decided to switch back scores close to the last minute, realizing their experiment had failed. It is believed the material Haslinger did record specifically for the studio as his intended version of the score was subsequently destroyed shortly after his removal. Whether Haslinger retained any of his work for personal purposes is currently unknown. There has of late been two versions of the film Universal has known to have shown to test audiences, both however featured Elfman’s score in some form. Elfman’s original recording, which had been completed for a previous cut of the film, was “fit” to the new version via orchestrator Conrad Pope. Some confusion has surfaced regarding this, as many news sources are claiming Elfman never “completed” his score, sidestepping that he did, in fact, complete it, but has not re-shaped it to fit the studio’s ever evolving changes.
Vineri, 9 Aprilie 2010
Superb, ce sa mai.
Joi, 11 Noiembrie 2010
Din articol si comentarii reiese ca ti s-a facut blowjob pe filme de groaza :)) ma ingrozesc sa aud asta :))
Joi, 11 Noiembrie 2010
De ce, nu se poate decit pe muzica de balet ?